Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 51999 (KAR)

SRI MUNIRAJU N R v. SMT NARASAMMA

RFA/2937/2025 · 2026-01-06

Sachin Shankar Magadum

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:581 RFA No. 2937 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 2937 OF 2025 (SP) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. MUNIRAJU .N.R S/O LATE RAJANNA .G AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.320 NELAGADARANAHALLI YESWANTHAPURA HOBALI BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU-560073. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. KRISHNAPPA .M.N, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. NARASAMMA W/O LATE. NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS 2. SRI. HANUMANTHARAYA S/O LATE. NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 3. SRI. SHEKAR S/O LATE. NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 4. SRI. JAYANNA S/O LATE. NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS Digitally signed by AL BHAGYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:581 RFA No. 2937 of 2025 5. SMT. SOWMYA D/O LATE. NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT SHETTIHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBALI TUMAKURU TALUK, TUMAKURU (M) 99021 19488 (M) 99010 38120 (M) 90661 94571 …RESPONDENTS THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 08.07.2025 PASSED ON I.A NO.III IN OS NO.1/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, TUMAKURU, ALLOWING THE I.A.NO.III FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11(d) R/W SEC.151 OF CPC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM ORAL JUDGMENT Office has raised objection regarding maintainability of the appeal. The suit was valued at Rs.7,50,000/- for the purpose of pecuniary jurisdiction. Therefore, appeal is not maintainable before this Court. Office objection is upheld. Appeal is dismissed as not maintainable. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:581 RFA No. 2937 of 2025 Registry to forthwith return certified copies of the judgments after securing photocopies. Liberty is reserved to the appellant to prefer appeal before the District Court. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE CA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 60