2026:MHC:2993 WA No. 1912 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR WA No. 1912 of 2026 P.Murugesan ..Appellant(s) Vs 1. The Management Cheyyar Co-Operative Sugar Mills Ltd, Anakkavoor-Thenthandalam, Cheyyar, Thiruvannamalai. 2. The Presiding Officer Additional Labour Court of Vellore, Vellore District. ..Respondent(s) Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent issuing writ of certiorari to set aside the order dated 06.02.2025 passed in WP No. 10260 of 2012 and direct the 1st Respondent to pay the entire back wages along with other terminal, attendant and other monetary benefits payable at the time of retirement to the appellant and thus render justice. For Appellant(s): Mr.P.Jagadeesan JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The present intra-court appeal has been instituted challenging the writ order dated 06.02.2025 in W.P.No.10260 of 2012. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2026:MHC:2993 WA No. 1912 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 2. The Writ Court granted relief in favour of the appellant. Appellant was terminated from service and he raised an industrial dispute in ID No.358 of 2002. An order was passed to reinstate the appellant along with the benefits. The management preferred writ petition. Writ court passed an order on 06.02.2025 and the relevant portion is extracted hereunder: “… 9. In the afore stated circumstances, the Writ Petition is disposed of by confirming the order passed by the Labour Court in ID. No.358/2002 by directing the petitioner Management to settle the terminal benefits to grant continuity of service and settle the terminal benefits of the petitioner along with attendant benefits. The petitioner is directed to settle the terminal benefits and all other attendant benefits due to the first respondent workmen within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.” 3. Writ court pertinently confirmed the order of the Labour court passed in ID No.358 of 2002. Therefore misconception of the appellant that award may not be implemented is incorrect. If at all award is not implemented, he has to approach the competent Labour Court for execution of award under Industrial Disputes Act. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2026:MHC:2993 WA No. 1912 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 4. With these observations the writ appeal stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions, if any, are closed. (S.M.S.,J.) (N.S.,J.) 17-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No GD To 1. The Management Cheyyar Co-Operative Sugar Mills Ltd, Anakkavoor-Thenthandalam, Cheyyar, Thiruvannamalai. 2. The Presiding Officer Additional Labour Court of Vellore, Vellore District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2026:MHC:2993 WA No. 1912 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND N.SENTHILKUMAR, J. GD WA No. 1912 of 2026 17-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis