Ajithkumar v. The State Represented by, The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/18982/2026 · 2026-07-17
G K Ilanthiraiyan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 51995 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 51995 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.No.18982 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 17.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.18982 of 2026 Ajithkumar
... Petitioner(s) Vs. The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Avadi Tank Factory Police Station, Chennai ... Respondent(s) Crime No.203 of 2026 PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.203 of 2026 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s) : Mr.M.Vetrivel For Respondent(s) : Mr.S.Yogaraj Sekar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 30.05.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 125, 311 and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in Crime No.203 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.18982 of 2026
2. It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioner waylaid the defacto complainant at knife point and robbed a sum of Rs.750/- from him. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner has been in custody since 30.05.2026 and that, in any event, his further custody is not required for the purpose of investigation. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police, while opposing the grant of bail, reiterated the prosecution case and, on instructions, submitted that the petitioner has four previous cases of a similar nature and that the investigation is still pending. It was further submitted that, if the petitioner is enlarged on bail, there is every possibility of his tampering with witnesses. 5. Considering the submission of the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) that the investigation is still pending and having regard to the criminal antecedents of the petitioner and the nature of the allegations, this Court is of the view that, if the petitioner is enlarged on bail, the same would pose a threat to society. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.18982 of 2026
6. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 17.07.2026 skr To
1. The learned Judicial Magistrate, Ambattur
2. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Sub Jail, Poonamallee
3.
The Inspector of Police, Avadi Tank Factory Police Station, Chennai
4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.18982 of 2026 G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. skr Crl.O.P.No.18982 of 2026 17.07.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis