- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3761 WP No. 38296 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 38296 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MUNIRAJU SON OF LATE MUNIYAPPA, NOW AGED 47 YEARS, RESIDENT OF DODDABELE VILLAGE, KENGERI HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT PIN – 560 060. 2. SMT.CHENAMMA D/O LATE MUNIYAPPA NOW AGED 54 YEARS, RESIDENT OF KCHOODAHALLI VILLAGE, UTTARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT PIN – 560 060. 3. SMT.VEERAMMA D/O LATE MUNIYAPPA NOW AGED 43 YEARS, RESIDENT OF KCHOODAHALLI VILLAGE, UTTARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT PIN – 560 060. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. X.M. JOSEPH AND SRI. DUSHYANTH ARADHYA, ADVOCATES) Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3761 WP No. 38296 of 2025 AND: 1. THE TAHSILDAR BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, KENGERI HOBLI, BENGALURU-560 001 2. RAJANNA SON OF LATE NARASIMHAIAH, NOW AGED 56 YEARS, RESIDENT OF DODDABELE VILLAGE, KENGERI HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT PIN – 560 060. 3. MANJUNATHA M SON OF SHRI.MARAPPA, GED ABOUT 54 YEARS, HOUSE NO.2201, “VYSHNAVI TERRACE” 4TH CROSS, DOLLARS COLONY, J.P.NAGAR, 6TH PHASE, BENGALURU – 560 078. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE ORDER TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO CONSIDER THE OBJECTIONS OF THE PETITIONER SUBMITTED, VIDE OBJECTIONS ANNEXURE-E DATED 19-11-2025 AND ANNEXURE-F DATED 03-12-2025 AND ANNEXURE-G DATED 12-12-2025 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3761 WP No. 38296 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER The petitioner and learned counsel for petitioner have filed a memo dated 20.01.2026 stating that prayer made in the writ petition has become infructuous and therefore the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition. 2. The memo is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. 3. Accordingly the writ petition stands disposed of as the prayer made in the writ petition has become infructuous. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE KLY