ANINDYA BARAI @ ANI @ ANINDA BARUI @ ANINDAY BAIRAI v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR
CRM(M)/314/2026 · 2026-02-05
Tirthankar Ghosh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5196 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5196 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
05.02.2026 Court No.35. D/L.168. Rakib (Allowed)
CRM (M) 314 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Barasat Police Station case no. 606 of 2025 dated 14.11.2025 under Sections 137(2)/140(3)/3(5)/351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
And In the matter of : Anindya Barai @ Ani @ Aninda Barui @ Aninday Bairai.
……Petitioner. Mr. Moyukh Mukherjee Mr. Abhijit Singh
……for the Petitioner. Ms. Faria Hossain, Ld. APP Ms. Sanjida Sultana
……for the State.
Affidavit-of-service filed by the petitioner be kept with the record. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for about 82 days. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail. I have taken into account the statement of the victim. There is added plea also of the petitioner that he would be sitting in the Higher Secondary examination, 2026, accordingly, the petitioner be released on bail. Thus, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Accordingly, petitioner namely, Anindya Barai @ Ani @ Aninda Barui @ Aninday Bairai shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs. 10,000 (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each,
2 one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned Special Court under the POCSO Act, Barasat, North 24 Parganas. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date before the learned trial Court in seisin of the case and shall not enter the jurisdiction of Barasat Police Station except for the purposes of attending the Court. Learned Special Court, if required, would impose such other conditions as he deems fit and proper for ensuring the presence of the petitioner in course of the trial. Accordingly, the application for bail being CRM (M) No. 314 of 2026 is allowed. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)