HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 31628 of 2026 Court No. - 79 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard Mrs. Swati Agrawal Srivastava, learned counsel for applicant and learned AGA. 2. Present application has been preferred with prayer to direct the learned court concerned to accept one personal bond and one surety of like amount in all the six cases in which applicant has already been extended bail. 3. During course of argument, a precise query has been raised before learned counsel for applicant that whether applicant has ever preferred same personal bond along with one same surety in all the cases wherein he has been enlarged on bail and if so, whether there is a specific denial from learned trial court in shape of asking separate sureties for separate cases. In response to the query, learned counsel for applicant fairly submitted that applicant has never preferred any bail bond in pursuance to any of aforesaid cases in which he has been enlarged on bail and there is no specific denial from learned trial court concerned. 4. In view of the aforementioned discussions and after perusing the records, this Court finds that no prejudice has been caused to applicant as he never intended to prefer bail bond in pursuance to any bail order passed by learned court concerned, although applicant has already been extended bail in all the cases but at no point of time, he intended to prefer any bail bond and as such, there is hardly any denial available in record with regard to common surety in each and every bail bond. Hence, no Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Suraj Singh Chauhan, Swati Agrawal Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vishal .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) cause of action arises in favour of applicant to pursue the instant application. 5. In view thereof, applicant is directed to prefer an application before learned concerned court seeking the same prayer as sought through the instant application within 15 days from today which shall be decided by learned court concerned within next 15 days in light of judgement rendered by Hon'ble Apex Court in cases of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. State of U.P., [decided on 29.10.2018 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 8914-8915 of 2018], Girish Gandhi vs. State of U.P. and others [2024 INSC 617, decided on 22.08.2024]. 6. The instant application stands disposed of, accordingly. September 8, 2026 Vivek Kr. NA528 No. 31628 of 2026 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad