[2026:RJ-JP:16305] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4965/2026 Seema Goyal W/o Shri Yogesh Kumar Gupta, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Near Shankar Atta Chakki, Mohan Nagar, Hindaun City, District Karauli. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Education (School/sanskrit) Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Deputy Secretary, Sanskrit Education Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Commissioner, Directorate Sanskrit Education, Rajasthan, Shiksha Sankul, J.l.n. Marg, Jaipur. 4. Shri Shivkumar Rajauriya, Lecturer Grade-I (Hindi), Employee Id Rjjw201122002837, Through Principal, Government Varishtha Upadhayay Sanskrit School, Sarmathura, District Dholpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rakesh Swami For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 17/04/2026 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition challenging the transfer order dated 06.01.2026 passed by the respondents, whereby she has been transferred to a place situated approximately 100 kms from her present place of posting. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the policy of the State Government, husband and wife are required to be posted at the same station. He further submits that the petitioner is suffering from medical condition affecting her [2026:RJ-JP:16305] (2 of 2) [CW-4965/2026] backbone for which she had been treated in the past. In support of the same, learned counsel has annexed medical documents from the year 2017 onwards and has prayed that the impugned transfer order on the ground of medical problem, may be quashed and set aside. 3. This Court considered the impugned transfer order as well as the medical documents placed on record. The last document annexed, is of November 2024, which indicates that the petitioner had been treated for medical ailment in her backbone in the past. However there is no recent medical document which shows that she is presently suffering from any such ailment. 4. In view of the above, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned transfer order. 5. Consequently, the present writ petition is dismissed. 6. However, in case any post is available in a nearby district, the respondents may consider accommodating the petitioner, subject to administrative exigency and their requirements. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J PAYAL DHAWAN /17