HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 31736 of 2026 Court No. - 70 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record. The applicant is involved in Case Crime No. 115 of 2026, under Sections 303(2), 324(4), 317(2) BNS, Police Station - Sector 113 Noida, District Gautam Buddh Nagar, during the pendency of trial. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He submits that the applicant was not named in the FIR. As per the prosecution story, informant had lodged the subject FIR against unknown persons with the allegation that on the date of the alleged incident, laptop and other article was theft after breaking the window of car of the informant, thereafter, and applicant and his co-accused has been falsely implicated in the subject case. It is submitted that applicant is neither known to the other co-accused nor any recovery was made from his possession. It is alleged that after three days, a false and concocted prosecution story was prepared and the applicant was implicated along with other co-accused persons in several criminal cases. It is further submitted that the applicant has no concern with the alleged offence and that no incriminating material connecting him with the present offence has been recovered. Co-accused of the applicant namely Lavish Kumar has already granted bail by this Court vide order dated 21.8.2026 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 29645 of 2026. Learned counsel further submits that Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Atul Shukla, Manoj Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rajendra Verma .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) subsequent to his arrest in the present case, the applicant was implicated in 9 other criminal cases on the basis of alleged recoveries, in all of which he has already been granted bail by the courts concerned. The details of the said cases have been disclosed in paragraph 14 of the affidavit filed in support of the bail application and the relevant bail orders have been brought on record as Annexure No. 3. It is lastly submitted that the applicant has been languishing in jail since 11.05.2026, that there is no likelihood of his fleeing from justice or tampering with the prosecution evidence; and that he is ready and willing to cooperate with the trial. It is, therefore, prayed that the applicant may be enlarged on bail. Learned A.G.A has opposed the prayer for bail but he has not disputed the above contention made by the learned counsel for the accused-applicant. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, perusing the record and also considering the nature of allegations, arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a fit case for granting bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let applicant - Rajendra Verma be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions, which are being imposed in the interest of justice:- (i) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the dates fixed, unless his personal presence is exempted. (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal and anti-social activity. In case of breach of any of the above condition, the prosecution will be at liberty to move an application before this Court for cancellation of the BAIL No. 31736 of 2026 2 bail of the applicant. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. September 9, 2026 Brijesh BAIL No. 31736 of 2026 3 (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad