IN THE H M/s Tarun Valv Union of India a CORAM : HO HO Present : Mr for Mr for DEEPAK SIBA Lea pendency of the notice, the respo he be permitted referred final or Dis January 14, 20 vandana Whether speakin Whether reporta Sr. No.335 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH CWP-37737 Date of Deci n Valves through its proprietor Versus India and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA Mr.Chetan Jain, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sourabh Goel, Sr. Standing Co for the respondent-Union of India. *** SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitio of the present petition, in pursuance e respondents have passed the final ord mitted to withdraw this petition with l inal order. Dismissed as withdrawn with libert (DEEPAK JU (LAPITA JU 14, 2026 speaking/reasoned : Yes/No reportable : Yes/No JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH 37737 of 2025 (O&M) f Decision : 14.01.2026 …Petitioner …Respondents EPAK SIBAL PITA BANERJI Counsel, India. petitioner submits that during ance of the impugned show-cause- nal order and in light of the above, with liberty to challenge the afore liberty as prayed for. EPAK SIBAL) JUDGE PITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2026.01.16 13:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document