Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5189 (AP)

D P SUBBAIAH, PRAKASAM DIST & 6 OTHERS v. S SRINIVAS, PRAKASAM DIST & 6 OTHERS

CRP/3019/2016 · 2026-07-09

Purushottam Kumar Chintalapudi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010313742016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3606] FRIDAY, THE 10th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3019/2016 Between: 1. D P SUBBAIAH, PRAKASAM DIST & 6 OTHERS, - 2. BANDARU NAGA BUSHANAM, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED 47 YEARS. 3. BANDARU SUBBA RAO, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED 52 YEARS. 4. BANDARU NAGAIAH, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED 37 YEARS. 5. DEVANDLA VENKATA LAKSHAMMA, W/O. LATE PEDDA SUBBAIAH, AGED 65 YEARS. 6. DEVANDLA YEDUKONDALU,, S/O. LATE PEDDA SUBBAIAH, AGED 45 YEARS. 7. DEVENDLA RAMAIAH, S/O. LATE PEDDA SUBBAIAH, AGED 43 YEARS. ALL THE PETITIONERS ARE TRADERS, R/O. RAYAVARAM VILLAGE, MARKAPUR MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. S SRINIVAS PRAKASAM DIST 6 OTHERS, S/O. VENKATA SUBBAIAH, AGED 35 YEARS. 2. SASANALA VENKATESWARLU DIED, - 3. SASANALA SAROJINI, W/O. LATE VENKATESWARLU, AGED 46 YEARS. 4. SASANALA LALITHA, W/O. ANISETTY YEDUKONDALU, AGED 35 YEARS. 5. KOTARI NAMITHA, W/O. SAMEER NAIDU, AGED 32 YEARS. 6. SASANALA MANDAKINI, W/O. LATE VENKATESWARLU, AGED 30 YEARS. 7. SASANALA SIVA KUMAR, S/O. LATE VENKATESWARLU, PKC, J CRP No.3019 of 2016 2 AGED 28 YEARS. ALL THE RESPONDENTS ARE R/O. MARKAPUR TOWN AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toaggrieved by the Order dated 24.02.2016 passed in E.P No. 30 of 2015 in O.S No. 328 of 2007 on the file of the court of Learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Markapur IA NO: 1 OF 2016(CRPMP 3859 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in E.P.No. 30 of 2015 in O.S.No. 328 of 2007 on the file of the court of Learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Markapur and to receive the main Civil Revision Petition on file in the interests of justice and to pass IA NO: 4 OF 2016(CRPMP 17754 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PULIPATI RADHIKA The Court made the following: PKC, J CRP No.3019 of 2016 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CH.PURUSHOTHAM KUMAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3019 of 2016 ORDER: Learned counsel for petitioners and learned counsel for respondents are present. 2. Learned counsel for petitioners submitted that E.P. was disposed of and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Civil Revision Petition shall stand closed. ___________________________________ PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI,J Date:10.07.2026 sj PKC, J CRP No.3019 of 2016 4 77 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CH.PURUSHOTHAM KUMAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3019 of 2016 Date:10.07.2026 sj