Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5187 (PNJ)

MANPREET KAUR ALIAS MAMTA v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/38359/2022 · 2026-01-15

H S Grewal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-38359-2026 1 IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 227 CRM-M-38359-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 15.01.2026 Manpreet Kaur @ Mamta ... Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab and another ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. GREWAL. **** Present: Mr. Vipul Babuta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rohit Hans, DAG., Punjab. **** H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 CPC seeking seeking quashing of FIR No.29 dated 01.02.2022 under Sections 376-D, 354, 506, 120-B IPC (Sections 376-D, 354, 506, 120- B were deleted and Section 384, 511 IPC were added) registered at Police Station Division No.5, Ludhiana. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the main accused has already settled the matter with the complainant. He submits that the petitioner has been implicated without any substance. 3. Learned State counsel submits that the matter is still under investigation. ARCHANA ARORA 2026.01.19 11:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-38359-2026 2 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Keeping in view the above and the submissions made herein, and in view of the statement made by the learned State counsel, the respondent-State is directed to complete the investigation and final report be submitted expeditiously, preferably within a period of 04 weeks. 6. Disposed of accordingly. (H.S. GREWAL) JANUARY 15, 2026. JUDGE archana Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No ARCHANA ARORA 2026.01.19 11:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document