HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 31928 of 2026 Court No. - 70 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 323 of 2026, under Sections 308(5), 308(2), 318(4), 249, 221, 351(2), 196, 61(2) BNS, Police Station Kotwali Lalitpur, District Lalitpur, during the pendency of trial. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motives and mala fide intentions. The First Information Report has been lodged against two named accused persons, namely, the applicant and and co-accused namely Satyabhan @ Golu Yadav. It is also submitted that the FIR in the present case has been lodged by a Sub- Inspector merely on the basis of an alleged apprehension, without there being any concrete or credible evidence against the applicant. Significantly, the FIR does not disclose any specific date, time or place of the alleged occurrence, thereby rendering the allegations vague and doubtful. It is further submitted that the there is criminal history of three cases against the applicant has been duly explained in paragraph 27 of the bail application. The applicant is in judicial custody since 10.04.2026 and has remained incarcerated for a considerable period. Learned counsel for the applicant has further submitted that if the applicant is released on bail, he would not misuse liberty of bail and is ready to co-operate in the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Aditya Prakash Singh, Mayank Awasthi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Jitendra Singh Yadav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) trial. 4. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid fact as argued by learned counsel for the applicant. 5. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties, facts of the case, nature of allegation and period of custody, gravity of offence, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for bail. Hence, the bail application is hereby allowed. 6. Let the applicant Jitendra Singh Yadav involved in the aforesaid case be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions: (i). The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. (ii). The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. (iii). The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted. (iv). The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected. (v). The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. September 9, 2026 S.K. BAIL No. 31928 of 2026 2 (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- SWEETY KANOJIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad