Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010045232026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/328/2026 BIBEK RAJMUKHI @ NAYAK S/O LATE BARRUN RAJMUKHI, R/O VILL- HARIGAON, P.S.- TEZPUR, DIST- SONITPUR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM 2:SMT. BHULUNG NAYAK S/O LATE ROBI NAYAK R/O VILL- KUSUM TULA P.S.- JAMUGURI P.O.- JAMUGURI DIST- DARRANG ASSAM PIN-78411 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A KHANIKAR, MR B DEORI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, R L CHUTIA(R2) Linked Case : ST.Rev./0/0 BIBEK RAJMUKHI ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM Page No.# 2/2 REPRESENTED BY PP ASSAM. ------------ Advocate for : MR BHASKAR DEORI Advocate for : appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER Date : 29-04-2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Heard Mr. A. Khanikar, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that there is a delay of 84 days in preferring the connected appeal against conviction of the applicant under Section 6 of the POCSO Act. Ms. B. Bhuyan, learned Addl. P.P. and Mr. R.L. Chutia, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 submit that they have got no objection to the delay being condoned. Accordingly, the delay of 84 days is condoned. Registry to register the connected appeal and list the same. I.A. is accordingly allowed and disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant