Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5186 (CHH)

JHARI RAM YADAV v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/2952/2021 · 2026-03-26

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:14579 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2952 of 2021 * - Jhari Ram Yadav S/o Shri Doman Yadav Aged About 41 Years R/o Village Bhawanipur, Tehsil Samarikusmi District Balrampur-Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh Presently Posted As Teacher (L. B.) In Govt. Middle School, Barwahipara, Block Kusumi, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through its Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Rajeev Gandhi Siksha Mission Through Its District Mission Director, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh 3 - District Education Officer District Balrampur-Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh 4 - Kamleshwar Prasad Jaiswal Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher (L. B.) At Govt. P. S. Barwahipara District Balrampur-Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Apoorva Pandey, Advocate holding the brief of Ms. Diksha Gouraha, Advocate. For Respondents No. 1 & 3 : Mr. Rishabh Chandra Singh Deo, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 27/03/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned appointment order issued by the Collector cum District Mission Director, Rajeev Gandhi Shiksha Mission, District – Balrampur-Ramanujganj, C.G. to an extent where the name of the private respondent is shown at Sr. No. 81. 10.2 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to consider the candidature of the petitioner on the post of Cluster Academic Coordinator in accordance with law and in light of the fact that the name of the petitioner has been proposed by the competent authority for the said post. Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2026.03.30 11:37:35 +0530 2 10.3 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other writ/ writs, order/ orders, relief/ reliefs in favour of the petitioner, which the Hon’ble Court deemed fit & just in the facts and circumstances of the case, including awarding of the costs to the petitioner.” 2. Mr. Rishabh Chandra Singh Deo, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State/respondents No. 1 & 3 would fairly submit that respondent No. 4 who was appointed against the post of Cluster Academic Coordinator has already got retired from services. He would submit that thus, the petition has become infructuous. 3. At this stage, Ms. Apoorva Pandey, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the Assistant Teacher who was appointed on the post of Cluster Academic Coordinator was not competent and therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation before respondents No. 2 and 3 and in turn, the authorities concerned may be directed to decide the representation so made by the petitioner strictly in accordance with law. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by Ms. Apoorva Pandey, this petition is disposed of at admission stage. The petitioner is permitted to make a representation before respondents No. 2 and 3 within a period of 30 days from today and in turn, the respondent authorities are directed to decide it in objective manner preferably within a period of 120 days. 6. With the aforesaid direction(s), the petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti