Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5185 (JHR)

BILENDRA GANJHU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./11865/2025 · 2026-02-20

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:5232 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 11865 of 2025 --------- Bilendra Ganjhu, aged about 22 years Son of Bifa Ganjhu Resident of Village- Chetar P.O. and P.S.-Chandwa, District-Latehar. ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Chaturvedy, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Fahad Allam, A.P.P. --------- 03/Dated:-20.02.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 111(3), 111(4), 308(3), 308(4), 308(5) and 61(2)(b) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of Arms Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he has committed no offence as alleged in the F.I.R. He further submits that the charge-sheet has been submitted and the case of the petitioner is committed to the court of sessions. He further submits that the petitioner for no offence has been languishing in custody since 02.02.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. He submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegations made against this petitioner coupled with the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted and the petitioner is in custody since 02.02.2025; therefore, I am inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I Latehar in connection with Balumath P.S. Case No. 12/2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No.324/2025 (S.T. Case No.164/2025). 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) FEBRUARY 20, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 24.02.2026