2026:UHC:489 SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA2 / 3 0 9 / 2 0 2 5 Hon 'ble Rak esh Th apliyal, J. 1. Mr. Avidit Noliyal, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Addl. Advocate General with Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. This is the second bail application moved on behalf of the applicant Sukhvinder Singh @ Sakkhi seeking bail in relation to FIR dated 13.10.2024, bearing FIR/ Case Crime No. 231 of 2024, registered at P.S. Dineshpur District U.S. Nagar wherein the present applicant has been implicated for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 115(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 351(2), 352 of BNS 2023. 4. First bail application was rejected on 20.02.2025. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is not named in the FIR. He further submits that on 16.09.2025 PW1, on 05.12.2025 PW2 (injured witness) and on 03.01.2026 PW3 (injured witness) were examined and all of them have been declared hostile. It is argued that there is a cross version of the incident regarding which an FIR was lodged on 13.10.2025 at 8: 31 am and in the said FIR all the accused persons have been enlarged on bail. He further submits that the applicant is languishing in jail since 28.10.2024. 6. On the other side, Mr. Sandhu, learned Addl. Advocate General for the State have not disputed this fact PW1, PW2 (injured witness) and PW3 (injured witness) have been declared hostile and also has not disputed that in the cross 2026:UHC:489 FIR the accused persons have been enlarged on bail and the order granting bail is enclosed in BA1 No. 1962 of 2025. 7. After hearing the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that PW1, PW2 (injured witness) and PW3 (injured witness)have been declared hostile and in the cross FIR the accused persons have been enlarged on bail, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail. 8. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the bail application is allowed. 9. Let the applicant Sukhvinder Singh, be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. 10. It is made clear that after being released on bail the applicant shall join the trial court proceedings on each and every date and will not seek unnecessary adjournment and will ensure his presence on the first day of every month in the nearest police station and the concerned S.H.O. shall record his presence failing which the concerned S.H.O. immediately apprise to the Trial Court. ( Rak esh Th apliyal, J.) 1 0 .0 1 .2 0 2 6 Parul 2026:UHC:489