Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5180 (RAJ)

RAMNARAYAN MEENA S/O LATE SHRI ROOPNARAYAN MEENA v. ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.

CMA/3446/2025 · 2026-04-16

Sandeep Taneja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:16012] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 3446/2025 Ramnarayan Meena S/o Late Shri Roopnarayan Meena, aged about 70 years, R/o Dhani Darbano Ki Post Natata, Tehsil Jamwaramgarh, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Appellant Versus 1. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Office 10Th Floor Nbc Center Sehkar Marg, Lal Kothi Scheme, Jaipur-302015. Insurance Company Vehicle No. Rj-14-Lj-2058. Insurance Policy No. 243601/31/2020/4250. Validity Date From 31.12.2019 To 30-12-2020. 2. Ashok Kumar Yogi S/o Shri Banwari Lal Yogi, R/o Plot No. 67, Jogiyon Ka Mohalla, Majipura, Tehsil Jamwaramgarh, District Jaipur.(At The Time Of Accident Driver Of Vehicle No. Rj-14-Lj-2058). 3. Mahendra Kumar Yogi S/o Shri Rajendra Prasad Yogi, R/o Jogiyaon Ki Dhani, Majipura, Tehsil Jamwaramgarh District Jaipur.(At The Time Of The Accident, Vehicle Owner No. Rj-14-Lj-2058). ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Pankaj Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amar Nath Pareek HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA Judgment 16/04/2026 1. This appeal has been filed under section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 by the appellants-claimants (for short ‘claimants’) against the judgment and award dated 04.06.2025 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, No.1, Jaipur Metropolitan II in M.A.C. Case No.150/2021, whereby claim petition filed by the claimants was partly allowed. [2026:RJ-JP:16012] (2 of 2) [CMA-3446/2025] 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that during the pendency of this appeal, the parties have resolved their dispute amicably by way of a compromise and pray that the present appeal be disposed of in light of the said compromise. 3. A copy of memo of compromise duly signed by learned counsel for the claimant and the Insurance Company, has been placed on record on 02.04.2026. On a specific query by this Court, learned counsel for the parties submit that they are duly authorized by their respective parties to execute the memo of compromise, which reads as under:- "The humble claimant-appellant and respondent no. 1 have entered into the compromise on the terms that the insurance company is ready and willing to make further enhancement of the compensation amount to the tune of Rs.370000/- (Rs. Three Lac Seventy Thousand Only) in all which includes interest parts as well, meaning thereby the insurance company would make the payment of Rs.370000/- (Rs. Three Lac Seventy Thousand Only) in addition to the amount already paid by the insurance company within two months from the date of passing the order on the basis of compromise which will payable through saving account of the appellant/claimant." 4. In view of the above, the present appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties. 5. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J 103 - RAVI KHANDELWAL