DAMAN NAYAK ALIAS DOMAN NAYAK v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./11470/2025 · 2026-02-20
Rajesh Kumar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5180 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5180 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:5134 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 11470 of 2025
.... Daman Nayak @ Doman Nayak aged 28 years S/o Late Haldhar Nayak, resident of Rupuskundi, P.O. & P.S.-Chakulia, District-East Singhbhum, Jharkhand
.… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... Opposite Party
.... CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
For the Petitioner
: Mr. Chandrajit Mukherjee, Adv. For the State
: Mr. S.K.Mahto, A.P.P.
.... 03/20.02.2026
1. The applicant who is in custody since 15.02.2025 has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with S.T. No.186 of 2025 arising out of Chakulia P.S. Case No.37 of 2024, G.R. No.51 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 306 of IPC, pending in the court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-I, Ghatshila.
2. This matter relates to the death of wife of the applicant.
3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant(s) that complete set of F.I.R. alongwith its enclosure have been annexed with this bail application and there is no suppression on his/her part.
4. Innocence has been claimed and undertaking has been given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that three witnesses have already been examined and they have turned hostile. There is no cogent material. On the above basis prayer for bail has been made.
5. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Considering the allegation made, material available and the stage of the trial, I am not inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail, at this stage. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the applicant stands rejected. (Rajesh Kumar, J.)
20.02.2026 Shahid/ Uploaded on 21.02.2026