Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 51783 (MAD)

Selvaraj v. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep by The Superintendent of Police

CRL OP(MD)/13812/2026 · 2026-07-16

R Vijayakumar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.(MD).No.13812 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.07.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Crl.O.P(MD)No.13812 of 2026 Selvaraj ...Petitioner/ Defacto Complainant Vs State of Tamil Nadu Represented by its 1. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Vijayanarayanam Police Station, Tirunelveli District. (Crime No.189 of 2026) 3. The Inspector of Police, CBCID, Tirunelveli. ... Respondents PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, to direct the first respondent to transfer the investigation in Crime No.189 of 2026 on the file of the second respondent to third respondent or any other competent investigation agency or to complete the investigation and pass such further or other order as this Court may deem fit. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD).No.13812 of 2026 For Petitioner : Mr.R.Maheswaran For Respondents : Mr.B.Arun Counsel for State of TN (Crl.Side) ORDER The present Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the defacto complainant in Crime No.189 of 2026 on the file of the second respondent police seeking to transfer the investigation to any other agency. 2. A perusal of the records reveal that on the complaint lodged by the petitioner herein, an FIR has been registered in Crime No.189 of 2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 109(1) and 351 (3) of BNS, 2023 and Section 3 of Tamil Nadu Property (Prevention of Damage and Loss) Act, 1992. 3. According to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, AR copy as well as the complaint lodged by the petitioner clearly reveal that three persons are involved. He further submitted that apart from A1, his wife and son namely Arumugakani and Sivasubramanian, have also involved in the said incident. However, the police officials have not changed the complaint 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD).No.13812 of 2026 and they have not implicated the wife and son of A1. Therefore, the present petition has been filed. 4. According to the learned Counsel for State of TN (Crl.Side) appearing for the second respondent, they are continuing with the investigation and they are recording the statement of the employer of the defacto complainant's son and they are also investigating about the whereabouts of the wife of A1. 5. Considering apprehension expressed by the petitioner herein, the investigation shall be monitored by the first respondent herein and the second respondent is directed to file the final report within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. With the above said observation, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. 16.07.2026 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ebsi 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD).No.13812 of 2026 To 1. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Vijayanarayanam Police Station, Tirunelveli District. (Crime No.189 of 2026) 3. The Inspector of Police, CBCID, Tirunelveli. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Madurai 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD).No.13812 of 2026 R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J. ebsi Crl.O.P(MD)No.13812 of 2026 16.07.2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis