Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5178 (GAU)

ESAM UDDIN @ KALACHAN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.

I.A.(Crl.)/423/2026 · 2026-04-28

Michael Zothankhuma, Rajesh Mazumdar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010075082026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/423/2026 ESAM UDDIN @ KALACHAN S/O MD. KASHEM ALI, R/O NO 4 BHATKUCHI GAON, BARPETA, P.S. BAGHBAR, DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM. 2:SRI BINOY DAS S/O. LT. PURAN DAS R/O. BONIABARI P/O. SIVASAGAR DIST. SIVASAGAR ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. P BORAH, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : ST.Rev./0/0 MD ESAM UDDIN ALIAS KALACHAN S/O MD KASEM ALI R/O NO. 4 BHATKUCHI GAON BARPETA PS BAGHBAR DIST BARPETA ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REP BY THE PP ASSAM Page No.# 2/2 2:BINOY DAS S/O LT PURAN DAS R/O BONIABARI PO SIVASAGAR DIST SIVASAGAR ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR PARAM HANGKHA KONWAR Advocate for : appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER Date : 29-04-2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Heard Ms. P. Borah, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that there is a delay of 2 days in preferring the connected appeal against conviction of the applicant under Section 376(3) IPC read with Section 4(2) of the POCSO Act. Ms. B. Bhuyan, learned Addl. P.P. submits that she has got no objection to the delay being condoned. Accordingly, the delay of 2 days is condoned. Registry to register the connected appeal and list the same. I.A. is accordingly allowed and disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant