MS BHABANI PERFORMER v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 11 ORS
WP(C)/2142/2026 · 2026-04-23
Devashis Baruah
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5177 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5177 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010074352026
2026:GAU-AS:5781
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2142/2026 MS BHABANI PERFORMER NARAYAN COMPLEX, PANDU, BARA BAZAR, GUWAHATI- 12 REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER, DEBOJIT BHATTACHARJEE, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O LATE RATHINDRA BHATTACHARJEE, R/O PANDU, P.S.- JALUKBARI, DISTRICT- KAMRUP(M), ASSAM, PIN- 781012 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 11 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, PUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT (ROADS), DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 06 2:THE DEPUTY SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM PUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT (BUDGET BR.) DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 4:THE SECRETARY UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF DONER NEW DELHI 5:THE CHIEF ENGINEER PWD (ROADS) ASSAM
Page No.# 2/3 CHANDMARI GUWAHATI-3 6:THE CHIEF ENGINEER PWD (BORDER ROADS) ASSAM CHANDMARI GUWAHATI-3 7:THE ADDL. CHIEF ENGINEER PWD (ELECT.) ASSAM CHANDMARI GUWAHATI-3 8:THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER PWD GUWAHATI ELECTRICAL CIRCLE GUWAHATI- 1 9:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER P.W.R.D DISPUR TERRITORIAL ROAD DIVISION GUWAHATI- 21 10:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD GUWAHATI ELECTRICAL DIVISION CHANDMARI GUWAHATI PIN- 781003 11:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWDR GUWAHATI CITY DIVISION NO-11 GUWAHATI-21 12:THE TREASURY OFFICER NEW GUWAHATI TREASURY GUWAHATI- 2 AFor the Petitioner(s) : Mr. K. R. Patgiri, Advocate
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. B. Gogoi, SC, PWD & Finance
Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R 24.04.2026 Heard Mr. K. R. Patgiri, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and Mr. B. Gogoi, the learned counsel who appears on behalf of the PWD and the Finance Department of Assam.
2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submits that taking into account that there are issues which would require factual adjudication, the Petitioner would be well advised to approach the Competent Court of Civil Jurisdiction. He, therefore, submits that the Petitioner would like to withdraw the instant writ petition without prejudice to avail remedies before the Competent Court of Civil Jurisdiction.
3. Taking into account the above, the instant writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.
4. The withdrawal of the instant writ petition shall not prejudice the Petitioner to avail remedies before the Competent Court of Civil Jurisdiction, if so permissible under law.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant