IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3349 of 2026 ====================================================== Pramod Singh S/o Late Paramhans Singh @ Prahlad Singh, Resident of village- Saidpur, P.S.- Salimpur, District- Patna, Bihar. At present-village- Mahmadpur, Ranisarai, Ward No. 27, P.O. and P.S.- Bakhtiyarpur, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Land Revenue and Land reform Department, Patna. 2. The District Magistrate, Patna. 3. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Barh, Patna. 4. The Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Bakhtiyarpur, Patna. 5. The S.H.O., Bakhtiyarpur, Patna. 6. The Circle Officer, Bakhtiyarpur, District- Patna. 7. Vijendra Singh, Son of Late Ramcharitra Singh, Resident of Village- Mahmadpur, Ranisarai, Ward No. 27, P.O. and P.S. - Bakhtiyarpur, District- Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Government Pleader (03) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 16-03-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present application has been preferred for the following relief(s): a. to direct the Respondents to comply the order dated 07.01.2025 passed by Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Barh, Patna whereby whereunder the Circle Officer, Bakhtiyarpur, the Executive Officer, Bakhtiyarpur Nagar Parishad, and the Station House Officer, Bakhtiyarpur, are Patna High Court CWJC No.3349 of 2026(2) dt.16-03-2026 2/4 hereby directed to ensure the removal of the disputed wall and staircase (platform) located in the street under their supervision, for immediate ensure removal of encroachments from the passage which is used for the entrance of the petitioner's house situated at Mauza-Mohmadpur, P.S.- Bakhtiyarpur, Khata No-09, Khesra No.56, District-Patna. b. to direct the Respondents to ensure the passage must be vacated and not encroached by Private Respondents. c. to issue any other direction deemed fit in the interest of justice and public welfare. 3. It is unfortunate that even for the compliance of the order passed by the Executive Officers, the petitioner has to knock the door of Patna High Court. In this particular case, the Sub-Divisional Officer, Barh passed an order on 27.01.2025 but the copy was provided vide memo no. 217 dated 25.04.2025 (after three months) (Annexure-1 to the petition). 4. The last three paragraphs of the order is/are recorded herein below: iqu% fooknh Hkwfe uxj ifj’kn~] cf[r;kjiqj esa gksus ds dkj.k dk;Zikyd inkf/kdkjh] uxj ifj’kn~] cf[r;kjiqj ls izfrosnu dh ekWax fd;k x;k gSA tks i=kad 1649 fnukad&19-11-2024 ls izkIr gqvk] tks vfHkys[k ij miyC/k gSA ftls voyksdu fd;kA izfrosnu ls Li’V gksrk gS fd izFke i{k izeksn flag ds ?kj ds Patna High Court CWJC No.3349 of 2026(2) dt.16-03-2026 3/4 nf{k.k ,oa f}rh; i{k fotsUnz ds ?kj ds mRrj nksuksa i{k ds chp yxHkx ikWap QhV dh xyh gSA mlh xyh ls izFke i{k oxSjg dk vkus&tkus dk jkLrk gSA ftlesa fotsUnz flag }kjk vks’Bh dk fuekZ.k djk;s gq;s gSA ftls rksM+uk vko”;d gSA mlds vykos orZeku esa vkus&tkus dk dksbZ jkLrk ugha gSA izfrosnu ds lkFk fcUnqokj izfrosnu vafdr gSa] tks izfrosnu ds lkFk layxu gSA mijksDr lHkh fcUnqvksa ij xgu leh{kksijkar ;g Li’V gksrk gS fd f}rh; i{k fotsUnz flag }kjk fooknh xyh IykWV ua0 56 esa fl<+h rFkk IykWV ua0 55 esa fnokj nsdj vke jkLrk dks vo:) ,oa ladh.kZ dj fn;s gSA ftlls izFke i{k ,oa vU; xzkfe.kksa dks vkus&tkus esa dkQh dfBukbZ;k¡ mRiUu gks jgh gSA vr% vapy vf/kdkjh] cf[r;kjiqj] dk;Zikyd inkf/kdkjh] uxj ifj’kn~] cf[r;kjiqj ,oa Fkkuk/;{k] cf[r;kjiqj dks vkns”k fn;k tkrk gS fd viuh fuxjkuh esa xyh esa fLFkr fookfnr fnokj ,oa lh<+h ¼vks’Bh½ dks gVokuk lqfuf”pr djsaA vkns”k dh izfr vapy vf/kdkjh] cf[r;kjiqj] dk;Zikyd inkf/kdkjh] uxj ifj’kn~] cf[r;kjiqj ,oa Fkkuk/;{k] cf[r;kjiqj dks vko”;d dkjZokbZ gsrq HkstsaA blh ds lkFk okn dh dk;Zokgh dks lekIr fd;k tkrk gSA ys[kkfir ,oa la”kksf/kr 5. All the three respondent nos. 4, 5 and 6, namely, the Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Bakhtiyarpur, Patna, the S.H.O., Bakhtiyarpur, Patna and the Circle Officer, Bakhtiyarpur, District- Patna were directed to take immediate steps. 6. One year later, the writ petition with the grievance that the three respondents have failed to abide by the order Patna High Court CWJC No.3349 of 2026(2) dt.16-03-2026 4/4 passed by the S.D.O., Barh. 7. In that background, this Court directs the concerned respondents to take immediate steps for compliance of the order in next four weeks from the date the copy of the order is received in their office to be provided by the petitioner or provide a reasoned order to the petitioner as to why it cannot be complied and should also record if there is any stay/ status quo with regard to the order in question by any authority/ Court. 8. Failure to do so, the Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Bakhtiyarpur, the S.H.O., Bakhtiyarpur, as also the Circle Officer, Bakhtiyarpur shall be facing contempt. 9. Learned State Counsel submits that he shall also be informing the three respondents today itself telephonically followed by letters. 10. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of. Vijay Singh/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U