Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5171 (RAJ)

CHARUL SHARMA D/O SHRI MAHESH CHAND SHARMA, W/O SHRI SAURAV KUMAR SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/375/2026 · 2026-03-12

Anil Kumar Upman

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:10570] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 375/2026 1. Charul Sharma D/o Shri Mahesh Chand Sharma, W/o Shri Saurav Kumar Sharma, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Bari, Dholpur, Rajasthan, Presently Residing At B-16-Sf4, Sahbhagita Vatika Road, Police Station Shivdaspura, District Jaipur. 2. Saurav Kumar Sharma S/o Ramesh Chand Sharma, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Villlage And Post Barauli, Sarmathura, Dholpur, Rajasthan, Presently Residing At B- 16-Sf4, Sahbhagita Vatika Road, Police Station Shivdaspura, District Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur. 4. The Deputy Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur (South). 5. The Superintendent Of Police, Dholpur 6. The Station House Officer, Sarmathura, District Dholpur. 7. The Station House Officer, Shivdaspura, District Jaipur (South). 8. Jamuna Prasad S/o Sugan Lal Sharma, Residing At Bari, Dholpur, Rajasthan. 9. Mahesh Chand Sharma S/o Jamuna Prasad, Residing At Bari, Dholpur, Rajasthan. 10. Vinod Sharma S/o Jamuna Prasad, Residing At Bari, Dholpur, Rajasthan. 11. Rajkumar S/o Jamuna Prasad, Residing At Bari, Dholpur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents [2026:RJ-JP:10570] (2 of 3) [CRLW-375/2026] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish K. Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP with Mr. Shubham Sain, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 12/03/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. 2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.8 to 11 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. It is submitted that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Arya Samaj, Govindpuri, Kakretha, Sikandara, Agara, Uttar Pradesh on 02.03.2022 and same has been registered on 02.03.2022. The certificate of registration of marriage of the petitioners is annexed with this petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos.8 to 11 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before [2026:RJ-JP:10570] (3 of 3) [CRLW-375/2026] respondent No.6-Station House Officer, Police Station Sarmathura, District Dholpur and respondent no.6 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /257