SHRAVAN KUMAR ALIAS SHARVAN KUMAR SINGH ALIAS SHARWAN KUMAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./1202/2026 · 2026-04-07
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5171 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5171 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(2026:JHHC:9904) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 1202 of 2026
Shravan Kumar @ Sharvan Kumar @ Sharwan Kumar Singh, aged about 31 years, son of Dukhan Singh, r/o village – Baghmada (Barahdurwa Tola), PO & PS – Chhatarpur, District – Palamau, Jharkhand.
… … …Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand.
… … …Opp. Party ------
For the Petitioner : Md. Imtiyaz, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Achinto Sen, Addl. P.P. ------
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------
Order No:- 06, Dated:- 07th April, 2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection Chhatarpur P.S. Case No. 53 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 309 (4) of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the co-accused persons, committed robbery of a Scorpio vehicle and the looted vehicle was later recovered from the possession of the co-accused namely Pravesh Yadav, after the same met with an accident. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-7 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that charge-sheet has been submitted in this case without putting the petitioner on Test Identification Parade. It is also submitted that the co-accused namely Pravesh Yadav has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 20.06.2025 passed in B.A. No.4909 of 2025. It is then submitted that the
petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 17.11.2025 as is evident from para-7 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palamau, at Daltonganj, in connection with Chhatarpur P.S. Case No. 53 of 2025, with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Aditi