CRL OP No. 18388 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL OP No. 18388 of 2026 Muniraj, S/o.Kuppusami, Mittapalli, Masigam Post, Pernambut Taluk, Vellore District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State rep by, The Inspector of Police, Pernambut Police Station, Vellore District. (Crime No.229/2025) 2. Sneha, D/o.Ramesh, Mittapalli, Masigam Post, Pernambut Taluk, Vellore District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to call for the records in charge sheet in Spl.S.C.No.186 of 2025 on the file of the Court of the Sessions Judge, Special Court for Exclusive Trial of case under POCSO Act, Vellore and quash the same and pass any or other such orders that this court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case and thereby render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.Vijaya Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Rajasekaran Government Counsel (Crl. Side) for R1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 18388 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 6 ORDER This Criminal Original Petition seeks to quash Spl.S.C.No. 186 of 2025 on the file of the Court of the Sessions Judge, Special Court for Exclusive Trial of case under POCSO Act, for alleged offences under Sections 376(2)(n), 376(2)(f) of IPC r/w. 9 of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2005 and 5(1), 5(j) (ii), 6(1) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, (the POCSO Act) on the ground of compromise between the parties. The parties are present before the court and, on examination, stand by their compromise and do not want the case to proceed further. 2. The broad contours of the High Court's power to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr.p.c. and Section 528 of the BNSS in respect of compromise of non-compoundable offences are laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Gian Singh -Vs- State of Punjab and Another (2012 10 SCC 303)and other subsequent judgments. 3. This is a serious case under the POCSO Act, with societal ramifications. As such, the Court will not rely solely on the version of the victim child/Prosecutrix but has a duty to consider the entire gamut of facts and attendant circumstances. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 18388 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 6 4. The following circumstances of this case are borne in mind : i)A careful perusal of the allegations does not reveal a forceful assault or enticement under direct or indirect pressure, but the offence arises out of a premature adolescent romantic relationship rooted in mutual innocence and biological attraction; ii) The victim child's date of birth is taken into account, and she has now turned a major; iii) It is submitted that the accused and the victim are married, share an emotional bond, and live as a family; iv) They have a female child born to them; v) The accused is working as manual labour and the family is eking out a lawful livelihood. 5. The fact that the prosecutrix or the family members are no longer interested in the prosecution, that they are not going to co-operate with the prosecution, and that there is no likelihood of a meaningful trial is also taken into account. 6. This Court, in Vijayalakshmi and Another -Vs- State (2021 SCCOnline Mad 317), has already taken the view that such adolescent relationships should https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 18388 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 6 not result in the incarceration of the boy alone and has called for appropriate legislative action to deal with these cases separately. 7. The purpose of exercising extraordinary power is to maintain social order. The very purpose behind the POCSO Act will be lost if the trial is allowed to proceed in the instant case, which is, pure and simple, a private relationship between the accused and the victim child. 8. For all the above reasons, Crl.O.P. No. 18388 of 2026 is allowed. The Spl.S.C.No. 186 of 2025 on the file of the Court of the Sessions Judge for Exclusive Trial of case under POCSO Act, Vellore stands quashed. 14-07-2026 Neutral Citation: No KKN https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 18388 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 6 To 1. The Inspector of Police, Pernambut Police Station, Vellore District. 2.The Court of Sessions Judge, Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Case under POCSO Act, Vellore. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 18388 of 2026 __________ Page6 of 6 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. KKN CRL OP No. 18388 of 2026 14-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis