NIKHLESH SINGH AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
CWP/810/2026 · 2026-01-08
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5170 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5170 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.810 of 2026 alongwith
CWP No.822 of 2026
Decided on: 8th January, 2026 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. CWP No.810 of 2026 Nikhlesh Singh and others
…..Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. and others
.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. CWP No.822 of 2026 Devender Dutt Sharma and another
…..Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. and others
.....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Yogesh Kumar Chandel, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
2
2.
With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matters are heard at this stage.
3.
Petitioners’ grievance is that their representations dated 07.12.2025 (Annexure P-5) seeking applicability of Mohit Sharma & Anr. Versus State of H.P. & Ors.2 have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer.
4.
Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, these writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners dated 07.12.2025 (Annexure P-5) in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment in the case of Mohit Sharma2 within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners.
2 CWP No.1638 of 2024, decided on 29.11.2024
3
The writ petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua January 08, 2026
Judge Mukesh