Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 51694 (MAD)

A.Kamal Sahib v. K.Arumugam, IAS.

CONT P/3918/2025 · 2026-07-17

G Arul Murugan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:MHC:2930 CONT P No. 3918 of 2025 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN CONT P No. 3918 of 2025 and SUB APPL No. 1244 of 2025 A.Kamal Sahib ..Petitioner(s) Vs K.Arumugam, IAS., The Director, Local Fund Audit, Kuralagam, IV Floor, Chennai-600 108 Currently Having Office at K.Anbazhagan Maligai, 4th floor, Nandanam, Chennai 600035. ..Respondent(s) Contempt Petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for having committed deliberate willful disobedience of the orders of the High Court made in W.P.No.21650 of 2012 dated 21.10.2024. For Petitioner(s): Ms.Kaavya Silambanan For M/s.Kaavya Silambanan Associates For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Veeramani Government Pleader https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2026:MHC:2930 CONT P No. 3918 of 2025 __________ Page2 of 4 Mr.C.Selvaraj For R2 in WP No.21650/2012 ORDER The present contempt petition has been filed alleging disobedience of the orders dated 21.10.2024 passed in W.P.No.21650 of 2012. 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing on 19.06.2026, this Court passed the following order: “Mr.R.Veeramani, learned Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the respondent/The Director of Local Fund Audit and submits that necessary funds have already been released to the Thiruthani Municipality in compliance with the orders passed by this Court on 21.10.2024. However, he further submits that the same is delayed by the Municipality. 2. Issue Statutory Notice to the respondents 3 and 4 in the Writ Petition in W.P.No.21650 of 2012.” 3. Today, when the matter is listed for hearing, the 3rd respondent/the Municipal Commissioner, Thiruthani Municipality is present before this Court. Mr.C.Selvaraj, learned counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent in the writ petition in W.P.No.21650 of 2012 submits that the order passed in the writ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2026:MHC:2930 CONT P No. 3918 of 2025 __________ Page3 of 4 petition has been complied with and the amounts recovered have been duly refunded to the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the same. 4. In view of the order having been complied with, the Contempt Petition stands closed. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 17-07-2026 Jeni To The Director, Local Fund Audit, Kuralagam, IV Floor, Chennai-600 108 Currently Having Office at K.Anbazhagan Maligai, 4th floor, Nandanam, Chennai 600035. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2026:MHC:2930 CONT P No. 3918 of 2025 __________ Page4 of 4 G.ARUL MURUGAN, J. Jeni CONT P No. 3918 of 2025 17-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis