M/S. SIX DREAMS TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED v. M/S DECENTRO TECH PRIVATE LIMITED
CMP/722/2025 · 2026-01-22
Ashok S Kinagi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 51684 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 51684 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3874 CMP No. 722 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI CIVIL MISC. PETITION NO. 722 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
M/S. SIX DREAMS TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT.
8-2.269, NAMITHA RAJ PALLAZIO, ROAD NO.2, BANJARA HILLS, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA - 500033 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY, MR. KAUSHAL KUMAR …PETITIONER
(BY SRI. ARUNACHALAM SHIVAKUMAR., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
M/S DECENTRO TECH PRIVATE LIMITED HAVING ITS OFFICE AT HD-56, WEWORK VI-JOHN TOWER, 393, PHASE III,
Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3874 CMP No. 722 of 2025
GURUGRAM, HARYANA 122016.
2.
ROHIT TANEJA DIRECTOR OF DECENTRO TECH PRIVATE LIMITED DIN-08751972 HD-56, WEWORK VI-JOHN TOWER, 393, PHASE III, GURUGRAM, HARYANA 122016.
3.
PRATIK SHIRISH DAUDKHANE DIRECTOR OF DECENTRO TECH PRIVATE LIMITED DIN-06693222 HD-56, WEWORK VI-JOHN TOWER, 393, PHASE III, GURUGRAM, HARYANA 122016. …RESPONDENTS
THIS CMP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996, PRAYING TO APPOINT AN ARBITRATOR TO ADJUDICATE THE DISPUTE BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE RESPONDENTS AS PROVIDED UNDER CLAUSE 12.5 OF THE MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT DATED 20.02.2025 VIDE ANNEXURE A AND PASS SUCH OTHER ORDERS AS THIS HON’BLE COURT MAY DEEM FIT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3874 CMP No. 722 of 2025
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that, the matter is settled between the parties. Hence, he seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the petition.
2. Memo is taken on record.
3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. In view of dismissal of the petition, pending IA(s), if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE
PA CT:KHV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 57