Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010049962026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/293/2026 BARUN KALITA S/O SARAT KALITA, R/O ANANDA DAIMARY PATH, GANESHPARA, P.S.
FATASIL AMBARI, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REP BY THE PP, ASSAM 2:PURNIMA DAS W/O SRI APU DAS A R/O VILL. KUSHAL NAGAR CHANDMARI P.S. CHANDMARI DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. L DEVI, LEGAL AID COUNSEL Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : ST.Rev./0/0 SRI BARUN KALITA S/O SARATKALITA RESIDENT OF ANANDADAIMARY PATH GANESHPARA P.S.- FATASIL AMBARI DISTRICT -KAMRUP M ASSAM.
Page No.# 2/2 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY PP ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : LOVELY DEVI Advocate for : appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER Date : 29/04/2026 (Michael Zothankhuma, J)
1. Heard Ms. L. Devi, Learned Legal Aid Counsel for the applicant/appellant. Also heard Mr. R. R. Kaushik, Learned APP, Assam, appearing for the State.
2. This is an application for condoning the delay of 103 days in filing the appeal against the conviction of the applicant/appellant under section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012.
3. Mr. R.R. Kaushik, learned APP, Assam, submits that he has got no objection to the delay being condoned.
4. On consideration of the above, we condone the delay of 103 days.
5. IA is accordingly disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant