Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5168 (CHH)

SATPAL SINGH v. STATE GOVT. OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/492/2024 · 2026-01-18

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2026:CGHC:3151 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 492 of 2024 1 - Satpal Singh S/o Shri Bedram Kawar, Aged About 41 Years Oop Abhiyanta Working In Office Of Sahayak Abhiyanta (Vidyut Surakchha) And Sahayak Vidyut Nirikchhak, State, Of Chhattisgarh State Of Chhattisgarh Sub Division Rajnandgon Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Govt. Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Urja Department Ministry, Urja Department Ministry, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Superintending Engineer, (Vidyut Nirakchhak, Stat Of Chhatishgarh B Block Second Floor, Indravati Bhavan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate For State : Mr. Aditya Tiwari, Panel Lawyer S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 19/01/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs. “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to order respondents to treat petitioner’s length as 8 years and to promot the ALFIZA BAIG Digitally signed by ALFIZA BAIG Date: 2026.01.20 11:29:10 +0530 2 / 2 petitioner from 28.11.2016 from which treat Shri Manish Ram Take & Amt. Kousalya Bhagat have been promoted with consequential benefits. 10.2 That cost of litigation and any other relief which the Hon’ble Court deems fit may kindly also be awarded.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not pressing this writ petition on merits and is only seeking direction to respondent no. 1 to consider and take decision on representation dated 27.12.2023. 3. In view of submission made by learned counsel for petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of directing respondent no. 1 to consider and take decision on pending representation, in accordance with law, if already not decided. 4. With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition is disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Alfiza