BHAVNA VERMA AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER
CWP/809/2026 · 2026-01-08
Sandeep Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5166 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5166 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.809 of 2026 Date of Decision: 08.01.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Dr. Bhavna Verma & Anr. ……...Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr.
…....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioners: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Mr. Diwan Singh Negi, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) By way of instant petition, very innocuous prayer has been made on behalf of the petitioners to issue direction to the respondents to consider and decide their representation in light of
judgment passed by this Court in CWP No.4099 of 2022, titled as Abhinandan Kalia Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh.
2. While putting in appearance on behalf of the respondents, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, states that he is not averse to aforesaid innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioners.
3. In view of the above, present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the representations of the petitioners (Annexure P-14) expeditiously, preferably within four weeks from today in terms of aforesaid
judgment. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. January 08, 2026 (Sandeep Sharma), (sunil)
Judge 2