Sri Venkata Ganapathi Educational Society, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/18271/2026 · 2026-07-07
Kiranmayee Mandava
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5164 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5164 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
Date of reserved for orders : --------- Date of pronouncement : 08.07.2026 Date of uploading : 15-07-2026 APHC010343082026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] WEDNESDAY, THE 8th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 18271/2026 Between:
1. SRI VENKATA GANAPATHI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,, (SAI RANGA POLYTECHNIC) POTHANAPALLI VILLAGE, S.KOTA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL, BANKURU NARESH, S/O. KANNAM NAIDU, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O.
C4-69, MAIN ROAD, KOTTAKKI, VIZIANAGARAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, THULLUR MANDAL, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. - 522238
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF HIGHER EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, GARUDADRI K.K. TOWERS, LAKSHMI NARASIMHA COLONY, SERVICE ROAD MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT -522503. 3. THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, D.NO. 11-307, GARUDADRI K.K. TOWERS, LAKSHMI NARASIMHA COLONY, SERVICE ROAD, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT -522503. 2
4. STATE BOARD OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING, (AP- SBTET) REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY GARUDADRI KK TOWERS, SERVICE ROAD, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR - 522503
5. THE CONVENOR AND CHE, APPOLYCET -2026 ADMISSIONS, D.NO.11-307, GARUDADRI KK TOWERS, FLAT.NO.501,6TH FLOOR LAKSHMI NARASIMHA COLONY. BYPASS ROAD, NEAR DR YSR AAROGYASRI HEALTHCARE TRUST, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522 503. 6. ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION ALCTE, NELSON MADELA MARG, VASANTH KUNJ, NEW DELHI-110070. REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the Respondents 1 to 5 in not included the Petitioners Institution name and not allotted any single seat to the Diploma Courses in APPOLYCET -2026 Counselling Process contrary to the allotment made by the 6th Respondent, Apex Body i.e., AlCTE in Extension of Approval (EoA)/ Proceedings vide F.No. South-Central/1-46215680518/2026/EOA, dated 04-05-2026 and the Petitioners Institution name and Courses approved by the AlCTE and SB-TET was not disclosed on the web portal for the academic year 2026-27 in the ongoing APPOLYCET-2026 Counselling as being arbitrary, illegal, unwarranted and violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and contrary to the provisions of the AlCTE Act, 1987 and consequently direct the Respondents to permit the Petitioners Institution to take admissions in full intake capacity and all courses as approved by the AlCTE for the Academic IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to pass an interim direction directing Respondent Nos.2 to 5 to forthwith include the Petitioner Institution name in the APPOLYCET-2026 Counselling and forthwith reflect and display in the ongoing APPOLYCET- 2026 admissions web portal the enhanced intake capacity and additional courses as approved by the 6'^ Respondent All India Council for Technical
3
Education (AlCTE) in Extension of Approval (EoA)/ Proceedings vide F.No. South-Central/1 -46215680518/2026/EOA, dated 04-05-2026 along with EWS seats by permitting the Petitioner’s Institution to take admissions in the courses in full intake approved by the 6th Respondent, pending disposal of the Writ Petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.
RAMBABU KOPPINEEDI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. M UMA DEVI (CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL)
2. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following Order: The present writ petition is filed challenging the action of the respondents Nos.1 to 5 in not including the name of the petitioner’s institution in the web counselling and in not allotting any seat for admission into Diploma Courses in APPOLYCET-2026, contrary to Extension of Approval granted by the respondent No.6, the Apex Body, vide proceedings in F.No. South- Central/1-46215680518/2026/EOA, dated 04-05-2026, and the proceedings of the 4th respondent dated 18-05-2026. 2. Heard Sri K. Rambabu, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Higher Education appearing for respondents. 3. It is contended that the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) and the State Board of Technical Education & Training (AP-SBTET), the respondent No.4, herein have accorded approval for admission to diploma, in respect of the following five courses:
4
Level Program Course Affiliating Body (University/Bod y Intake Approv ed for 2025-26 Intake Approve d for 2026-27 NRI Approva l Status Internationa l Students Approval Status Diploma Engineering and Technology Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning State Board of Technical Education and Training, Andhra Pradesh 0 60## No No Diploma Engineering and Technology Computer Science and Engineering State Board of Technical Education and Training, Andhra Pradesh 0 60## No No Diploma Engineering and Technology Electrical and Electronics Engineering State Board of Technical Education and Training, Andhra Pradesh 60 60 No No Diploma Engineering and Technology Electronics and Communicati on Engineering State Board of Technical Education and Training, Andhra Pradesh 60 60 No No Diploma Engineering and Technology Mechanical Engineering State Board of Technical Education and Training, Andhra Pradesh 120 60 No No
4. However, respondent No.1 did not issue the No Objection Certificate (NOC), and its name has not been reflected on the web portal for the ongoing counselling. As a result, the petitioner is deprived of the opportunity to participate in the ongoing web counselling process for admission of the students. 5. The petitioner submits that, despite being otherwise eligible under the statutory provisions, it has been unable to admit students due to the non- issuance of the NOC. It is further submitted that the petitioner submitted an application seeking issuance of a No Objection Certificate before the respondent. No.1, and the said application is still pending for consideration. 5
6.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, prays for appropriate directions the respondents to allow the petitioner to participate in the ongoing counseling process. 7. Having regard to the submissions made, as the petitioner’s application for grant of No objection is pending for consideration before the 1st respondent and the Counselling for admissions into diploma courses has already been commenced, this court deems it appropriate to dispose of the Writ Petition directing respondent No.1 to consider and pass appropriate orders on the petitioner's application seeking issuance of a No Objection Certificate, stated to have been filed on 18.05.2026, within a period of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Date: 08.07.2026 RMR
Whether the order is : Speaking ☑ Reasoned
Reportable
Non-reportable ☑
6
124 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION No: 18271 OF 2026 Date: 08.07.2026
RMR