Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5162 (ALL)

YASMIN SULTANA v. UNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/33258/2026 · 2026-09-08

Saral Srivastava, Sudhanshu Chauhan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33258 of 2026 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Sri Sanjay Yadav (Advocate Roll A/S 0139/2012) holding brief of Sri Vinod Kumar Maurya, learned counsel for the petitioner states that no cause of action survives in the present writ petition. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. September 9, 2026 SS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vikas Pal, Vinod Kumar Maurya Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Pooja Agarwal, Ram Bali, Siddharth Singhal (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Yasmin Sultana .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad