Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 516 (ALL)

BHOLA AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/8079/2026 · 2026-03-18

Atul Sreedharan, Siddharth Nandan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 8079 of 2026 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE ATUL SREEDHARAN, J. HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners has prayed to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to avail alternative remedy available in law. 2. Shri Sumit Kumar, learned counsel for the State has no objection to the aforesaid prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. March 19, 2026 Sumit K. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay, Vinod Kumar Maurya Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Suresh Singh (Siddharth Nandan,J.) (Atul Sreedharan,J.) Bhola And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SUMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad