Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 51573 (KAR)

SMT K A MALLIGE v. SMT. LINGAMMA ALIAS NINGAMMA

WP/36939/2025 · 2026-01-22

Vijaykumar A Patil

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3634 W.P. No.36939/2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.36939/2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT. K.A. MALLIGE W/O SRI. K.A. ACHAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT KISHAN NILAYA BEHIND PONNAMPET COURT COMPLEX NISARGA NAGAR, PONNAMPET TALUK KODAGU DISTRICT-571216. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ADITYA CHATTERJEE, ADV.,) AND: SMT. LINGAMMA ALIAS NINGAMMA W/O MAHADEVA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS C/O SMT. K.S. MALLIGE KISHAN NILAYA, BEHIND PONNAMPET COURT COMPLEX, NISARGA NAGAR PONNAMPET TALUK KODAGU DISTRICT-571216. …RESPONDENT THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER, PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE A, DATED 13 NOVEMBER 2025 DISMISSING I.A. NO.06/2025 IN O.S 67/2023, PASSED BY THE LD. CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, FIRST CLASS, PONNAMPET CONSEQUENTLY, ALLOW I.A. NO.67/2025, PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE B, FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER ORDER XVI, RULE 1 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 AND PERMIT HER TO EXAMINE Digitally signed by ARSHIFA BAHAR KHANAM Location: High Court Of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3634 W.P. No.36939/2025 THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, CHESCOM, GONIKOPPA, AND THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TOWN PANCHAYAT, PONNAMPET AND & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of this petition, the petitioner sought the framing of issues and the trial Court accepted the request, and the issues were framed permitting the petitioner to adduce further evidence. 2. In view of the aforesaid submission, this writ petition would be rendered infructuous and is accordingly, disposed of. However, it is made clear that any finding recorded by the trial Court under the impugned order will not come in the way of the trial Court proceeding further in the matter. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE ABK, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9