Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5155 (CHH)

SERENIUS TOPPO v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/1803/2026 · 2026-02-16

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2026:CGHC:8404 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1803 of 2026 • Serenius Toppo S/o Late Shri Anthony Toppo Aged About 64 Years R/o House No.- 2035, Shivaji Nagar, Daldal Seony, Raipur, Dist- Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Tribal Welfare, Ministry At Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Atal Nagar, Dist- Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Chairman Board Of Director Chhattisgarh State Antyavasai Sahkari Vitta Evam Vikas Nigam, Tri Building, 2nd Floor, Sector-24, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Dist.- Raipur (C.G.) 3. The Managing Director Chhattisgarh State Antyavasai Sahkari Vitta Evam Vikas Nigam, Tri Building, 2nd Floor, Sector- 24, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Dist.- Raipur (C.G.) 4. The Secretary Chhattisgarh State Antyavasai Sahkari Vitta Evam Vikas Nigam, Tri Building, 2nd Floor, Sector-24, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Dist.- Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Jai Prakash Shukla, Advocate For Respondent-State For Respondents No. 2 & 3 : : Mr. Siddharth Sharma, Panel Lawyer Mr. Priyanshu Ojha, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jha, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 17/02/2026 1. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that he is not pressing this writ petition on merits and only seeking direction to Respondents No. 2 & 3 to take decision on the representation submitted by petitioner at the earliest within specified time. 2. Submission made by learned counsel for petitioner is not opposed by learned counsel for the respective respondents. PAWAN KUMAR JHA Digitally signed by PAWAN KUMAR JHA 2 / 2 3. On due consideration of the submission made by learned counsel for the respective parties, without observing anything on merits of the case, this writ petition at this stage is disposed of permitting the petitioner to submit fresh representation before Respondents No. 2 & 3 and if such a representation is submitted the concerned authority shall consider and take decision on the representation to be submitted by petitioner, in accordance with law, expeditiously preferably within a further period of 03 months from the date of receipt of representation. 4. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with aforesaid observations and directions. 5. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) pwn JUDGE