VIKAS AGRAWAL v. KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
WP/36885/2025 · 2026-01-30
M Nagaprasanna
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 51522 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 51522 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5205 WP No. 36885 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 36885 OF 2025 (GM-CON)
BETWEEN:
VIKAS AGRAWAL S/O OF BRIJ BHUSHAN AGRAWAL, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, RESIDING AT FLAT NO. 517, TOWER 5, ROYAL LAGOON APARTMENTS, RAGHUNATHPUR, NANDAN KANNAN ROAD, BHUBANESHWAR, ORISSA - 751 024. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BHARGAVA D. BHAT, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BASAVA BHAVAN, HIGH GROUNDS, BENGALURU - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY REGISTRAR. 2. M/S. SKYLINE CONSTRUCTION AND HOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED,
Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5205 WP No. 36885 of 2025
REGISTERED OFFICE AT REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT NO. 11, HAYES ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 025, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MR. AVINASH PRABHU
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-DIRECTION OR ORDER REQUIRING THE HONORABLE KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION TO HEAR AND DISPOSE OF EXECUTION PETITION NO. 1/2022 WITHIN A TIME BOUND MANNER. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5205 WP No. 36885 of 2025
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner is before this Court seeking the following prayers:
"a. Issue an appropriate writ, direction, or order, requesting the Hon'ble Karnataka State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission to hear and dispose of Execution Petition No.1/2022 within a time bound manner;
b. Pass such other orders;
c. For costs."
2. Heard Sri. Bhargava D. Bhat, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 3. The petitioner has a decree at the hands of the concerned consumer forum and files an execution to execute the said decree. The execution is being adjourned from time to time, without any rhyme or reason is the allegation of the petitioner. Therefore, an innocuous prayer for disposal of the execution petition is sought at the hands of this Court. 4.
In that light, I deem it appropriate to direct the concerned Court to conclude the execution proceedings, within an outer limit of four months from the date of receipt of the
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5205 WP No. 36885 of 2025
copy of the order, in accordance with law, if not earlier, as it is languishing for the last four years before the concerned Court. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
JY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23