1 2026:CGHC:4839-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 56 of 2026 Smt. Pratiksha Jain D/o Late Kishore Kumar Jain Aged About 24 Years R/o C/o Smt. Pratibha Jain, I-106, Golden Sky, VIP Road, Raipur, Dist. Raipur C.G. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of Home, Indravati Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar Raipur C.G. 2 - Director General of Police, Police Head Quarter, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Raipur C.G. 3 - Inspector General of Police, Bilaspur Range, Bilaspur C.G. 4 - Senior Superintendent of Police, Bilaspur, Dist. Bilaspur C.G. 5 - Amil Kumar Jain S/o Sunil Kumar Jain Aged About 29 Years R/o Bharitya Nagar, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur C.G. ... Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Mr. Sudeep Johri and Mr. J.K. Gupta, Advocates For Respondents/State : Mr. S.S. Baghel, Govt. Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 29.01.2026 1 Heard Mr. Sudeep Johri and Mr. J.K. Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. S.S. Baghel, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the State-respondents. ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA 2 2 The present petition has been filed by the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, with the following prayers :- “1. That the Hon'ble court may kind enough to call the record of the petitioner. 2. That the Hon'ble court may be kind enough to issue a appropriate Writ/writs, order/ orders, direction/directions and to command the respondent no. 1 to 4 to initiate execution of the arrest warrants issued by the Family Court Raipur in MCC No. 776/2022, 593/2023, 1258/2023. 3. That the Hon'ble court may be kind enough to pass any appropriate writ, order or direction as deemed fit in the circumstances of the case and to command the rest of respondents as deemed fit in the circumstances of the case.” 3 After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to file appropriate petition before appropriate forum for redressal of his grievance. 4 Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 5 Certified copy of the documents, if any, shall be returned back to the petitioner after retaining photocopies of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Chandra