Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5148 (RAJ)

MUKHWINDER SINGH ALIAS MUKHA S/O ROOPWINDER @ RUPENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/16612/2025 · 2026-03-24

Sameer Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:12400] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16612/2025 Mukhwinder Singh Alias Mukha S/o Roopwinder @ Rupendra Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Baupur, Police Station Cheeka, District Kaithal (Haryana). (At Present Confined In District Jail, Tonk). ---Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16613/2025 Karamjeet Singh S/o Avtar Singh, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Naugav, District Patiyala, Punjab. ---Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajveer Singh Gurjar Mr. Vikram Singh Chauhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP with Mr. Ratan Singh Tanwar, SHO PS Dooni, Tonk HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 24/03/2026 1. S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16612/2025 has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 90/2025 registered at Police Station Ghar, District Tonk for the offence(s) under Section 8/15 of NDPS Act and S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application [2026:RJ-JP:12400] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-16612/2025] No.16613/2025 has been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 90/2025 registered at Police Station Ghar District Tonk for the offence(s) under Section 8/15 of NDPS Act. 2. In S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16612/2025, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is young man, aged about 27 years and is sole bread earner of his family. It is submitted that in the instant matter, the charge-sheet has already been filed and that the applicant is behind bars since 05.05.2025. It is further submitted that without any tangible evidence, merely on the statements of owner of the car, the applicant is arrested. It is lastly submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter, and therefore, should be enlarged on bail. 3. In S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16613/2025, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that merely on the basis of false statements tendered by Mukhwinder Singh, the applicant-Karamjeet Singh has been falsely implicated and the applicant is apprehending his arrest. It is further submitted that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the applicant. 4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the instant bail applications and has submitted that rigours of Section 37 would be applicable in the instant matters and, therefore, the concession of bail should not be granted. 5. The Investigating Officer has marked his appearance before the Court and has submitted that qua the applicant-Karamjeet Singh, there are four criminal antecedents registered, and qua the applicant-Mukhwinder Singh, there are two criminal antecedents [2026:RJ-JP:12400] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-16612/2025] registered. It is further submitted that during the course of investigation, CCTV cameras installed at two tool plazas were duly scrutinized and resultantly, the applicant-Mukhwinder Singh, is identified as the accused. It is submitted that the quantity of approximately 200 kilograms of the contraband-doda powder is recovered, which is four times higher than the prescribed commercial quantity. 6. Qua the applicant-Karamjeet Singh, it is observed that this Court has granted interim protection from arrest to the applicant and categorical directions were issued to the applicant to mark his appearance before Court vide order dated 18.03.2026, and the said direction were also not complied with by the applicant. 7. In light of foregoing facts and circumstances, taking note of the fact that the recovered quantity of the contraband is higher than the prescribed commercial quantity, and considering the criminal antecedents of the applicants, without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is not inclined to allow the present bail applications. 8. Accordingly, the instant bail applications stand dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK /s-137-138