Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 51465 (KAR)

SRI. AMBARISHA P v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/16436/2025 · 2026-02-04

M Nagaprasanna

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6739 CRL.P No. 16436 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 16436 OF 2025 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. AMBARISHA P S/O LATE PILLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT NO.655, MUNITHIMMAIAH LAYOUT, KUDLU MAIN ROAD, NEAR PRICIE TOOLS, KUDLU, BOMMANAHALLI BENGALURU - 560 068. 2. SMT. JAYALAKSHMAMMA W/O RAMARAJU, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT NO.386, 2ND WARD NEAR POST OFFICE, DOMMASANDRA, BENGALURU - 562 125. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. ADINARAYANAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY BENGALURU CITY EAST DCRE PS REPT BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6739 CRL.P No. 16436 of 2025 BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. SRI. SIDDARTH M S/O LATE MANI D AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/AT NO.308, 3RD FLOOR, ESTHRIYA BUILDING, NO.24, BTM 1ST STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 068. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VINAY MAHADEVAIAH, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. M.R. RAVI, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482(FILED U/S.528 BNSS) OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS PETITION AND QUASH THE FIR BEARING NO.7/2025 AND COMPLIANT ON DATED 30.10.2025 BY REGISTERED BY BENGALURU CITY EAST DCRE P.S., FOR THE OFFENCE 3(1)(r)(s), 3(1)(u), 3(2)(va) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT 2015 AND SEC.406,417,420 R/W SEC.34 OF IPC ON THE FILE OF THE CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU WHICH ARE PRODUCED HEREWITH AS ANNEXURE A AND B RESPECTIVELY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:6739 CRL.P No. 16436 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows: "MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL In view of Charge sheet filed by the 1st respondent police, the above petition is not maintainable and however the 1st petitioner are already challenged the charge sheet filed by the 1st respondent police in Crime No.07/2025 in Crl.Pet.No.840/2026. Hence the petitioners may kindly be pleased to permitting them to withdraw the above petition as not pressed in the interest of justice and equity. " In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE SJK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 45 CT:BHK