Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5144 (RAJ)

VAIBHAV SON OF RAMAVTAR @ RAMU v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4078/2026 · 2026-03-27

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4078/2026 Vaibhav Son of Ramavtar @ Ramu, Resident of Chhipa Mohalla, Holi Ka Khoot, Police Station Sangod, District Kota Rural, At Present Jaykara Medical Store Ke Makaan Me Kiraye Se, Suman Vihar, Balita Road, Police Station Kunhadi, Kota City (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Kota) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Aashima Mathur For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar-PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 27/03/2026 1. The instant bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. has been filed by the petitioner in connection with the FIR No. 212/2025 registered at Police Station Kunadi, District Kota City for the offences punishable under Sections 331(4) and 305(a) of BNS. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the alleged offences are triable by the Court of Judicial Magistrate. Counsel submits that after investigation, charge-sheet has been submitted and the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 03.09.2025 and the trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioner. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application. (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4078/2026] 4 Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments put forward by the learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that after investigation, charge-sheet has been submitted and also looking to the fact that the petitioner has been in custody since 03.09.2025 and since the trial will take its own time to conclude, hence, without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioner under Section 483 BNSS. 6. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner-Vaibhav Son of Ramavtar @ Ramu arrested in connection with afore- mentioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing, as and when called upon to do so. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/30