2026:JHHC:5112 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 11525 of 2025 Abdul Majit @ Sonu @ Abdul Majid, aged about 19 years, son of Sanaul Sk., Resident of Village-Chakdamiya, PO-Pakur, PS-Pakur(M), Dist.-Pakur, Jharkhand ... … Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Md. Asadul Haque, Advocate Md. Faruque Ansari, Advocate Md. Sharukh Ansari, Advocate For the State : Ms. Anuradha Sahay, APP -------- Order No. 03 /Dated: 19th February 2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 303(2) of BNS in connection with Pakur Town PS Case No. 238 of 2025. In this case, charge-sheet has been submitted for the offence under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 317(4), 112(2), 3(5) of BNS. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged in the FIR. He further submits that no any incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 06.09.2025 as such he may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner has direct nexus with the alleged occurrence. 5. Having regard to the gravity of the offence and the allegation made against the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the 2026:JHHC:5112 2 petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the instant bail application is dismissed, at this stage. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 19th February 2026 Amit Uploaded on .24/02/2026