MAHMUD ALAM v. MUSST CHAYERA KHANAM ALIAS SAYERA KHANUM (MINA)
I.A.(Civil)/504/2026 · 2026-04-28
Robin Phukan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5144 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5144 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010028882026
2026:GAU-AS:5879
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/504/2026 MAHMUD ALAM S/O LATE DR. ABDUR RAHIM,RESIDENT OF M.G. ROAD,P.O., P.S. DIST BONGAIGAON,PIN-783380, ASSAM 2: MD YAKUB ALAM S/O LATE DR. ABDUR RAHIM R/O M.G. ROAD P.O.
P.S. AND DIST. BONGAIGAON PIN 783380 ASSAM.
3: MUSSTT. WASIMA SULTANA D/O LATE DR. ABDUR RAHIM W/O DR. MAHBIBUL ISLAM R/O M.G. ROAD P.O.
P.S. AND DIST. BONGAIGAON PIN 783380 ASSAM.
4: MUSTT. SUMAIYA SULTANA @ SUMAIYA BEGUM D/O LATE DR. ABDUR RAHIM W/O MOJAKKIR HUSSAIN R/O HATIGAON CHARIALI SIJUBARI P.O. HATIGAON NEAR SBI GUWAHATI 38 DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM VERSUS
Page No.# 2/3 MUSST CHAYERA KHANAM ALIAS SAYERA KHANUM (MINA) D/O LATE KASEM KHAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KAWATIKA, KHANPARA, PO KAWATIKA, PS BIJNI, DIST CHIRANG, BTAD, ASSAM 783390 2:MRS. ASEFA ISLAM W/O MD. RASIDUL ISLAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DOLAIGAON PO AND PS BONGAIGAON DIST BONGAIGAON ASSAM 3:RASIDUL ISLAM S/O MD. BAHADUR ISLAM OLD COLONY QRT NO. M(81) B P.O.
P.S. AND DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN 783380 4:MD. RASIDUL ISLAM S/O BAHADUR ISLAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DOLAIGAON PO AND PS BONGAIGAON DIST BONGAIGAON ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. R CHOUDHURY, MD. MEMON AHMED,MS. B. HAZARIKA Advocate for the Respondent : ,
BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN ORDER 29.04.2026 Heard Ms. S. Ahmed, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Ms. R. Choudhury, learned Sr. counsel for the applicant.
Page No.# 3/3 This application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure is preferred by the applicant for correction of address of the respondent Nos.1—3. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has taken step upon the respondent Nos.1—3, but the said steps returned unserved with a report that no such person is available in the address and as such, she has obtained necessary instruction and also the address of the respondent Nos.1—3 and as such, she submits that the applicant may be allowed to take step upon the respondent Nos.1—3 at the new address. Prayer is allowed. Step upon the respondent Nos.1—3 at their new address be taken by speed post and also by usual process within a week from today. In terms of above, this I.A. stands disposed of. Comparing Assistant Sd/- Robin Phukan JUDGE