- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3870 WP No. 35843 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION NO. 35843 OF 2024 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: SRI R SHYAM SWAROOP SON OF LATE RAJASHEKHAR, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.36651, GRAND RIVER, AVE APT/201, FARMINGTON, MICHIGAN, USA, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.30, 1 MAIN ROAD, KASTHURBA NAGAR, MYSURU ROAD, BENGALURU-560 026. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. FAYAZ SAB B G., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SMT C P POORNIMA WIFE OF R.SHYAM SWAROOP, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, D/O.PUTTARAMAIAH, RESIDING AT SRIRANGA NILAYA Digitally signed by SOWMYA DODDAMARAIAH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3870 WP No. 35843 of 2024 YADAVA NAGARA, IN FRONT OF SIRICULTURE OFFICE, GEDDALAHALLI MAIN ROAD, SOMESHWARAPURAM, TUMAKURU-572 101. 2. SHYNI, D/O. R.SHYAM SWAROOP, AGED ABOUT 03 YEARS, REP. BY HER NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER, BOTH RESIDING AT SRIRANGA NILAYA, SMT.C.P.POORNIMA, YADAVA NAGARA, IN FRONT OF SIRICULTURE OFFICE, GEDDALAHALLI MAIN ROAD, SOMESHWARAPURAM, TUMAKURU-572 101. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS PERTAINING TO THE CASE OF THE PETITIONER AND TO GRANT THE FOLLOWING RELIEFS.SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 12/12/2024 PASSED IN CRL.MISC. NO. 174/2024 PENDING ON THE FILE OF I ADDL. PRL. JUDGE, FAMILY COURT AT TUMAKURU ON IA NO. II FILED UNDER SECTION 144(2) OF BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, (BNSS) 2023, WHICH IS PRODUCED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A AS ILLEGAL, ARBITRARY AND PASSED WITHOUT APPLICATION OF MIND. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3870 WP No. 35843 of 2024 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA ORAL ORDER No representation on petitioner's side on call. As per office endorsement the petitioner has not even furnished requisites to send notice to the respondents. Record discloses grant of sufficient time to furnish the requisites. A conditional order was also passed on 30.07.2025. Yet the petitioner did not choose to respond. Therefore, the writ petition stands dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2