Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5141 (UTT)

NOSHAD ALIAS SULLA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/637/2026 · 2026-05-07

Ashish Naithani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2 1 . BA] SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2026:UHC:3477 BA1 No.637 of 2026 Noshad @ Sulla Vs. State of Uttarakhand Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Ms. Rajni Rangwal, learned counsel for the Applicant. 2. Mr. Chitrarth Kandpal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Present bail application is moved by the applicant, who is in judicial custody in connection with FIR No.100 of 2026 under Section 8/21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, Police Station Jaspur, District Udham Singh Nagar. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant that on account of hot talk with the police personal the applicant has been implicated in the present case. She submits that no incident, on the date, place and time took place as alleged in the FIR. She submits that there is 2 hours delay in lodging the FIR. She submits that 6.60 grams smack (heroin) was recovered from the possession of the applicant and the same is much less than the commercial quantity. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court is of the view that applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 7. Accordingly, bail application is allowed. Let the applicant-Noshad @ Sulla be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. 8. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 07.05.2026 Arti