Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5141 (ALL)

SATISH KUMAR v. ARUN KUMAR, SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, (JUDICIAL), TEHSIL-SADAR

CAPL/5121/2026 · 2026-09-07

Vikas Budhwar

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 5121 of 2026 Court No. - 53 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Standing Counsel. 2. The present contempt petition has been preferred alleging non-compliance of the order dated 07.10.2025 passed in Writ C No. 34795 of 2025 which required the opposite party to consider the application of the applicant. 3. Today instructions have been produced containing the order dated 05/09/2026 deciding the proceedings under Section 24. 4. The said fact has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the applicant. Let a copy of the instructions be served upon the learned counsel for the applicant. 5. Accordingly, the contempt application stands consigned to record, leaving it open for the applicant to question the said order before appropriate forum in accordance with law. 6. Instructions have been filed today is taken on record and marked as Appendix-A. September 8, 2026 Ashu Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amit Singh Yadav, Gautam Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Satish Kumar .....Applicant(s) Arun Kumar, Sub Divisional Magistrate, (Judicial), Tehsil-Sadar .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad