Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 51354 (MAD)

A.AMUTHA v. The Superintendent of Police

WP Crl./184/2026 · 2026-07-15

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.Crl.No.184 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 15.07.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.Crl.No.184 of 2026 A.Amutha ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police, Villupuram district, Villupuram. 2.The Inspector of Police, Valavanur Police Station, Villupuram District. 3.Saravanan ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition(Crl.) filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st and 2nd respondents herein to give police protection to petitioner, her family members and workers to peacefully carryout work and sell the bricks in the brick kiln in the petitioner’s property in S.No.60/2, 59/16A, 59/5 situated at Koliyanur Village, Villupuram taluk, Villupuram District and S.No.186, 191/2, 191/3, 191/4, 191/5A and 195 situated at Melpathi Village, Villupuram taluk, Villupuram district totally measuring 4 Acre 09 cents by considering the petitioner’s representation dated 04.11.2025 For Petitioner : Mr.R.Jayaprakash For Respondents For R1 & 2 : Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar, Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.No.184 of 2026 For R3 : Mr.A.Arun Kumar ORDER This writ petition has been filed praying for a direction to the 1st and 2nd respondents herein to give police protection to petitioner, her family members and workers to peacefully carryout work and sell the bricks in the brick kiln in the petitioner’s property in S.No.60/2, 59/16A, 59/5 situated at Koliyanur Village, Villupuram taluk, Villupuram District and S.No.186, 191/2, 191/3, 191/4, 191/5A and 195 situated at Melpathi Village, Villupuram taluk, Villupuram district totally measuring 4 Acre 09 cents by considering the petitioner’s representation dated 04.11.2025 2. It is seen that the third respondent is the first wife’s son of the petitioner’s husband. Therefore, there is a civil dispute between the petitioner and the third respondent in respect of the aforementioned property. In such situation, police protection cannot be ordered to be granted to the petitioner. 3. Therefore, this writ petition is liable to be dismissed. However, if any cognizable offence is made out against the third respondent, the second respondent is at liberty to register FIR against the third respondent and proceed in accordance with law. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.No.184 of 2026 4. With the above observation, this writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. 15.07.2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order lok To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Villupuram district, Villupuram. 2.The Inspector of Police, Valavanur Police Station, Villupuram District. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High court of madras https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.No.184 of 2026 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J, lok W.P.Crl.No.184 of 2026 15.07.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis