Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5135 (KAR)

SRI GOPAL NAYAK v. SRI N.B. SHIVASHANKARACHAR

RFA/507/2014 · 2026-04-28

D K Singh, T M Nadaf

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23789-DB RFA No. 507 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 507 OF 2014 BETWEEN: 1. SRI GOPAL NAYAK AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, S/O MUNISHAMI NAYAKa R/AT FRONT OF THE COURT ROJIPURA 4TH WARD, DODDABALLAPURA NAGAR BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-561203 …APPELLANT (BY SMT. DIVYA .K, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. KRISHNA NAIK., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI N.B. SHIVASHANKARACHAR AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, S/O LATE BANAPPACHAR 2. SRI. N.S. BALAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, S/O N.B. SHIVASHANKARACHAR 3. SRI. N.B. CHIDAMBARACHAR, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, S/O LATE BANAPPACHAR, 4. SRI. N.C. MAHESH AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, S/O N.B. CHIDAMBARACHAR, Digitally signed by VASANTHA KUMARY B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23789-DB RFA No. 507 of 2014 R1 TO R4 ALL ARE R/AT NO.127, SHIVASHRUTHI, YELLAMMA TEMPLE ROAD, NAGAVARAPALYA, SRI.C.V.R. RAMAN POST, BANGALORE-560 093 5. SRI.M. HARISH AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, S/O M.MUNI REDDY R/AT ADDEVISHWANATHAPURA VILLAGE BANGALORE NORTH TALUK-561203 …RESPONDENTS (VIDE ORDER DATED 13.04.2016, NOTICE TO R1 & R2 IS HELD SUFFICIENT; R3 AND R4 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED; SRI. H.V.SUBRAMANYA, ADVOCATE FOR R5) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 14.2.2014 PASSED IN O.S.NO.210/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DODDABALLAPUR, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE AND DECLARATION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo dated 28.04.2026 praying to dismiss the present regular first appeal as withdrawn. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23789-DB RFA No. 507 of 2014 2. Memo is placed and the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 3. At the request of learned counsel for the appellant, since the matter is settled between the parties, the Court Fee paid shall be refunded to the appellant as per the relevant Rules. 4. In view of dismissal of the appeal, pending interlocutory applications, if any do not survive for consideration, hence stand disposed of. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE NG CT:SN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12