SRI TAPASH RANJAN DAS AND 6 ORS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS
I.A.(Civil)/861/2026 · 2026-04-28
Budi Habung
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5135 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5135 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010042692026
2026:GAU-AS:5887
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/861/2026 SRI TAPASH RANJAN DAS AND 6 ORS SON OF LATE CITTA RANJAN DAS RESIDENT OF AKSHOY SARANI SATSANGHA ASRAM RAOD CHIBITABICHA PT IX PO VIVEKANANDA ROAD PS SILCHAR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM 788007 2: SRI RATHINDRA KUMAR NATH SON OF LATE RABENDRA CH NATH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE UTTAR GANAKGARI PO AND PS SORBHOG DISTRICT BARPETA ASSAM 781317 3: SRI MUNINDRA PATAR SON OF LATE DIMBESWAR PATAR RESIDENT OF VILL PATIDAYA PO PATIDAYA PS MARIGAON DISTRICT MORIGAON 782104 ASSAM 4: SRI GOKULA NANDA SINGHA SON OF NIKUNJA BEHARI SINGHA RESIDENT OF VILL NATUN BAZAR WARD NO 03 HOJAI 782435 5: SRI RAJASHREE NAIDING SON OF TAPASH PURUSA RESIDENT OF VILL HAFLONG GOVT COLLEGE COLLEGE ROAD HAFLONG NORTH CACHAR NILLS ASSAM 788819 6: SRI JABA TALUKDAR DAUGHTER OF KAMAL TALUKDAR RESIDENT OF VILL SWADESH NAGAR DREAMLAND AMUSEMENT PARK KHANAPARA 781022 ASSAM 7: SRI KESHABANANDA BORDOLOI SON OF LATE GAHIN BORDOLOI VILLAGE BARACHILA PO BEBEJIA DISTRICT MORIGAON 78214 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM COOPERATION DEPTT DISPUR GUWAHATI 781006
Page No.# 2/3 2:THE REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES ASSAM KHANAPARA GUWAHATI 22 3:SANJAY KR BARMAN SON OF LATE KAMINI BARMAN SR INSPECTOR ARCS CACHAR SILCHAR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM 4:SHRI RAMKAMAL SINHA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS JR INSPECTOR ARCS CACHAR SILCHAR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM 5:JAHIR RIZWAN CHOUDHURY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS SR INSPECTOR AUDITOR ARCS HAILAKANDI ASSAM 6:RAJIB AHMED LASKAR AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS JR INSPECTOR AUDITOR RAMKRISHNA NAGAR ARCS KARIMGANJ DISTRICT KARIMGANJ ASSAM 7:NUR AHMED LASKAR AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS JR INSPECTOR AUDITOR ARCS CACHAR SILCHAR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM 8:NURUL HUSAN MAZUMDAR AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS SR INSPECTOR AUDITOR ARCS HAILAKANDI DISTRICT HAILAKANDI ASSAM 9:SHRI AJOY BAISHYA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS JR INSPECTOR ARCS CACHAR SILCHAR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM 10:ABU SHARIF ALI AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS SR INSPECTOR AUDITOR RCS GUWAHATI 22 DISTRICT KAMRUP METRO ASSAM 11:NABAJYOTI PATOWARY AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS SR INSPECTOR AUDITOR RCS GUWAHATI 22 DISTRICT KAMRUP METRO ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S HAZARIKA, MS M HAZARIKA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, CO OP, MR B SINHA
Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
ORDER 29.04.2026 Heard Mr. S. Hazarika, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard the
learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
2. By filing this application under Order I Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the applicants seeks impleadment in WP(C) No. 3684/2021 as respondent Nos. 3 to 9, as they are necessary parties for proper adjudication of the case, and any adverse order passed in the aforesaid writ petition would cause prejudice to them.
3. The respondent Nos. 1 and 2 have no objection to impleading the applicants as respondent Nos. 3 to 9 in the aforesaid writ petition.
4. In view of the above, the prayer for impleadment is allowed.
5. Accordingly, the present applicant Nos. 1 to 7 are impleaded as respondent Nos. 4 to 10 in the aforementioned writ petition, as respondent No. 3 has already been impleaded as per this Court’s order dated 27.04.2022.
6. With the above observation, this interlocutory application stands allowed and disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant