PRAGATI CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS v. UNION OF INDIA
O.M.P. (T) (COMM.)/44/2026 · 2026-04-20
Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5135 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5135 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 44/2026
PRAGATI CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Udaibir Singh Kochar, Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Ms. Samvartika
Pathak and Mr. Pushkar
Khanna, Advocates. versus
UNION OF INDIA
.....Respondent
Through: Mr. Shaurya R. Rai, Senior
Panel Counsel and Mr. Anmol
Sharma, Government Pleader
for UoI. CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN
SHANKAR
O R D E R %
20.04.2026
1. The present Petition has been filed under Section 14 read with Section 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking termination of the mandate of the learned Sole Arbitrator appointed vide Order dated 20.05.2024 in ARB.P. 710/2024, and for appointment of a substitute Arbitrator. 2. Certain disputes inter se the parties had arisen out the Agreement dated 14.09.2020. The arbitration clause is envisaged at Clause 64 of the General Conditions of Contract, 2019, appended to the Agreement. In view thereof, the arbitration was invoked and the learned Sole Arbitrator came to be appointed. 3. It is submitted that despite the appointment of the learned Sole Arbitrator vide Order dated 20.05.2024, the learned Sole Arbitrator is yet to enter into the reference. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/04/2026 at 12:43:21
4. Parties would therefore jointly submit that there is a dire necessity for the appointment of a substitute arbitrator in the interest of justice. 5. In view of the above, this Court is of the view that since the learned Arbitrator has been unable to take up the present matter for almost two years since the order appointing him as an Arbitrator was passed, it would be necessary and expedient to appoint a substitute Arbitrator. 6. The total value of the underlying disputes is stated to be approximately Rs. 15 crores. 7. Accordingly, this Court requests Hon’ble Mr. Justice (Retd.) G.S. Sistani, (Mobile No: 9871300034) to enter upon the reference and adjudicate the disputes inter se the parties in substitution of the learned Sole Arbitrator appointed vide Order dated 20.05.2024. 8. The present Petition, along with all pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. APRIL 20, 2026/tk/va
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/04/2026 at 12:43:21